Posted on by — Leave a comment

Danfoss VFD VLT2800 (VLT2900) fault err7 and err5 repair process

Danfoss Denmark produced two VLT2800 (2900) low-power (3kW) models, which tripped Err-7 during operation, meaning “overvoltage” and caused the frequency converter to shut down. Sometimes Err-5 is also triggered, with a high voltage warning. The measured three-phase power supply is 400V, which is within the rated range. Use the+key on the operation panel to call up the Ud (main circuit DC voltage) value. When it exceeds 600V, a trip and shutdown will occur.

According to the instructions: When the DC circuit of this model has an undervoltage below 370V, it will trip due to undervoltage; Low voltage warning given at 400V, but still operational; When it is not higher than 665V, a high voltage alarm is given, but it can still operate; When the voltage is higher than 665V -820V, the delayed tripping and shutdown can be described as having an extremely wide voltage protection range!
During the power on inspection, the Ud display value of a machine is unstable, which may be due to a change in resistance in the detection circuit. Diagnosed as abnormal Ud detection circuit. The Ud sampling circuit consists of 8 820k resistors and two 13k resistors connected in series, and their voltage division value is used as the Ud signal. Due to the urgent repair time required by the user, there was no time to thoroughly investigate the subsequent circuit. After connecting 8 820k resistor circuits with another 330k resistor in series, the machine was powered on and tested. When the input three-phase AC voltage was 440V (supplied by the regulator), Err-7 was no longer triggered, so the user took away the installation.
User installation, trial operation, one unit jumps Err-8, undervoltage; One device jumps Err-37 and has poor communication.
Determine if the Ud detection circuit is still faulty. Following the principle of prioritizing ease over difficulty, we will still focus on these 10 resistor detection circuits. Reserve three 820k resistors from the P+end of the power supply, connect a 6V voltage regulator in series and then connect the N end. Connect the 6V voltage regulator in series with a 1M or 100k semi variable resistor. Disassemble one 13k resistor at the signal input end and connect the center end of the variable resistor as the Ud signal. Calculate the Ud sampling voltage. When the input is 380V, it is approximately 2.2V. Adjust the semi variable resistor to output 2.2V at the center end, and define this voltage as U-sampling.
The process of power transmission and debugging is very interesting: when the U voltage is greater than 2.2V, Err-37 jumps when powered on, which means there is a communication failure between the control card and BMC. However, the essence of this phenomenon is that it is not because the communication between the control card and BMC is interrupted that Err-37 jumps, but because the control circuit detects that Ud is really “frighteningly high”, it forcibly interrupts the communication between the control card and BMC, and then jumps Err-37 to give a warning! When the U voltage approaches 2.2V, pressing the reset button can eliminate the Err-37 alarm, and FT-00 will appear on the screen, entering standby mode; When the U voltage is less than 2.2V, the Err-35 will jump when powered on, indicating a startup impulse fault: if the frequency converter repeatedly connects the power supply within one minute, an alarm will be generated. But the essence of this phenomenon is that because the CPU detects that Ud is surprisingly low, it is treated as a low Ud formed by repeatedly starting the frequency converter in a short period of time, and an Err-35 alarm signal is given! When the U voltage is less than 2.2V, the capacitor charging short-circuit contactor is also in the released state. Only when the U voltage is close to 2.2V (i.e. Ud is higher than 400V), this contactor will be energized and the frequency converter will be allowed to enter standby mode.
When FT-00 appears on the screen, press the+key to adjust the Ud value, adjust the variable resistor by half, and make it display 500V stably. At this point, when inputting 220V-460V, the displayed value remains stable at 500V. After installation, it has been running normally.
It should be noted that this can only be used as one of the emergency repair methods, and it is indeed an overvoltage false alarm. Assuming that the undervoltage alarm is caused by the loss of capacity of the DC energy storage capacitor in the main circuit, the cause of the fault must be identified, and the fault must be effectively eradicated before repairing the U-sampling circuit!

Additionally, some models have output voltage that depends on the sampling voltage of the DC circuit, i.e. the output voltage tracks the three-phase input voltage. After such processing, the output V/F ratio will change. But generally it will not affect the use; For vector frequency converters, the DC voltage sampling value affects the control of the output three-phase voltage and current, so the sampling voltage cannot be easily changed!

Posted on by — Leave a comment

The Ingenious Use of Reactors in INVERTER Retrofits and the Hazards of Grid Harmonics to Electronic Equipment

In modern industrial production, INVERTERs, as key equipment for motor speed regulation and energy saving, are increasingly being applied. However, during the retrofit of INVERTERs, some overlooked issues often lead to equipment damage, particularly the significant impact of grid harmonics on electronic equipment. This article, through examples, delves into the ingenious use of reactors in INVERTER retrofits, the hazards of grid harmonics to electronic equipment, and proposes corresponding solutions.

I. Application of Reactors in INVERTER Retrofits

When performing frequency conversion energy-saving retrofits on slip-ring motors, the original excitation box (abbreviated as speed regulation box) and slip mechanism are usually retained for emergency speed regulation operations in case of INVERTER failures. After the retrofit, the speed regulation knob on the speed regulation box is set to the full-speed position, while the required speed on the load side is set by the INVERTER to achieve speed regulation and energy-saving operation. However, such retrofits often result in accidents where the excitation coil or slip mechanism in the speed regulation box is repeatedly damaged.

The reason lies in the fact that during the original line-frequency excitation speed regulation, the establishment of feedback voltage keeps the excitation current in the excitation coil fluctuating within a small range, generally not reaching its maximum value. However, during frequency conversion operation, the actual speed of the motor is controlled by the INVERTER and may only reach half of the rated speed, with the speed feedback voltage also reaching only half of its amplitude. At this point, the speed given by the speed regulation box is full speed, so the speed regulation box continuously outputs the maximum excitation current (voltage), leading to an increase in the temperature of the excitation coil and making it prone to damage.

Furthermore, the three-phase rectifier inside the INVERTER is a nonlinear component, and its significant absorption of rectified current causes severe distortion of the power supply side voltage (current) waveform, resulting in non-negligible peak voltages and harmonic currents. These harmonic currents and voltage peaks can cause inter-turn breakdowns in the excitation coil, or breakdowns of the freewheeling diodes and thyristors in the speed regulation box, further causing damage to the excitation coil.

To solve this problem, a reactor can be connected in series on the power input side of the excitation coil of the speed-regulating motor. The introduction of the reactor can effectively suppress harmonic currents, reduce voltage waveform distortion, and thereby protect the excitation coil from damage.

II. Hazards of Grid Harmonics to Electronic Equipment

Grid harmonics not only affect speed-regulating equipment but also pose a serious threat to electronic equipment such as INVERTERs. For example, a small-power INVERTER installed in a certain location experienced multiple failures where the three-phase rectifier bridge was damaged. Despite the INVERTER’s small power, light load, and stable power supply voltage, the failures could not be avoided. After on-site inspections, it was found that two high-power INVERTERs were also installed in the same workshop and on the same power supply line. These three INVERTERs may operate simultaneously or start and stop at different times, and the harmonic currents generated by the operation and start-stop of the high-power INVERTERs are the root cause of the damage to the small-power INVERTER.

The nonlinear currents generated by high-power INVERTERs lead to increased distortion of the power supply side voltage (current) waveform, forming harmonic components. For high-power INVERTERs, due to their large internal space, the insulation treatment of the input circuit is easy to strengthen, so they are not easily damaged by overvoltage breakdowns. However, for small-power INVERTERs, their internal space is limited, insulation withstand voltage is a weak link, and they are difficult to withstand the surge voltage impacts on the power supply side.

III. Solutions and Application of Reactors

To address the aforementioned issues, the most effective solution is to connect a reactor in series on the power input side of the electronic equipment. The reactor can suppress harmonic currents, reduce voltage waveform distortion, and thereby protect the electronic equipment from damage.

For the excitation coil of speed-regulating motors: Connecting a reactor with a secondary measurement winding of a BK-type control transformer in series on the power input side of the excitation coil can effectively protect the excitation coil.

For small-power INVERTERs: Connecting an economical “three-phase reactor” made of an XD1 capacitive inrush current suppressor in series on the power input side can significantly reduce the impact of harmonic currents.

For reactive power compensation capacitor banks: Installing an XD1 capacitive inrush current suppressor at the inlet end of the capacitors to suppress the inrush currents and harmonic currents generated by the charging and discharging of the capacitors.

Through the implementation of these measures, the aforementioned three issues have been effectively resolved. The application of reactors not only improves the operational reliability of electronic equipment but also reduces retrofit costs and shortens retrofit cycles. Therefore, the ingenious use of reactors in INVERTER retrofits and electronic equipment protection cannot be ignored. By analogizing and adapting to different situations, many cumbersome issues can actually be easily resolved.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Repair of INVT P9G9-55kW inverter switch power supply

A 55KW inverter of the Envision suddenly shut down in thunderstorm weather, with no display on the panel, suspected of being damaged by lightning strikes.

Inspection: Both the input rectifier module and the output inverter module are undamaged. The switch power supply has no output, the switch tube is damaged, and the copper foil strip introduced by the power supply and the copper foil strip of the switch tube drain circuit have all detached from the substrate, indicating that this circuit has been subjected to high current shocks.
After replacing the switch tube and oscillation block 3844B, the switch power supply was first sent to an AC 220V rectifier power supply, which did not vibrate and confirmed that there was no short circuit phenomenon; Then send in a 500V DC power supply, and when powered on, the power supply will burn and fuse F1 will be introduced. Power outage measurement inspection, no short circuit phenomenon. After replacing the fuse, power on. When it is below 300V DC, it does not vibrate, but when it is sent to 500V, the fuse still burns. When there is a short circuit fault in the load circuit of the power supply, the power supply often cannot vibrate; It is suspected that there is a short circuit fault in the circuit of the switch tube after the vibration is triggered, but after measurement and inspection, there is indeed no short circuit phenomenon. Maintenance has entered a dead end.
Carefully observe the circuit board of the switch power supply. The approximately 550V DC power supply of the switch power supply is introduced through the main DC circuit, and the circuit board is a double-sided circuit board. The power supply terminal is located at the edge of the circuit board, with a+pole lead copper foil strip on the front and a – pole lead copper foil strip on the back. It was found that there is a “black wire” between the+and – copper foil strips on the edge of the circuit board! Due to humid weather, the insulation of the circuit board is reduced, causing sparks between the+and – copper foil strips and carbonization of the circuit board. When the power supply voltage is below a certain value, it will not break down. When it is above 500V, it will cause the carbonized circuit board to break down and burn out the fuse. The reason for burning the fuse is not due to a short circuit fault in the switch circuit after vibration, but rather caused by carbonization of the circuit board.

Remove carbides from the edges of the circuit board and perform insulation treatment. When fed into 500V, the fuse will no longer burn, but it will not vibrate. Check that the rectifier diode D38 (LL4148) of the 3844B power supply branch has a certain reverse resistance. After replacement, the machine tested normally.
The circuit board is broken down and carbonized after being damp, causing a fuse burning fault, which is also a relatively small fault phenomenon encountered in switch mode power supplies.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Repairing a Switch Power Supply Fault in a TECO 7200GA-30kW Inverter: A Detailed Diagnostic and Solution Guide

In the realm of industrial machinery, inverters play a crucial role in converting direct current (DC) to alternating current (AC), enabling the efficient operation of various electrical devices. However, like any complex electronic system, they are susceptible to faults, especially after encountering events such as lightning strikes. This article delves into the diagnostic process and subsequent repair of a TECO 7200GA-30kW inverter that exhibited random shutdowns and starting difficulties following a lightning-related repair.

TECO INVERTER power board

Initial Symptoms and Preliminary Inspections

The inverter, after being repaired from lightning damage, operated inconsistently for over a month. It experienced random shutdowns, sometimes occurring every few days or hours, and encountered difficulties during the starting process. Specifically, the capacitor charging short circuit contactor would jump, leading to failed starts, yet the operation panel did not display any fault codes. Despite these challenges, the inverter could occasionally start and run for a period before shutting down again.

To begin the diagnostic process, the control board was removed from the site. To bypass potential thermal protection issues, the terminals of the thermal relay were short-circuited. Similarly, the contact detection terminal of the capacitor charging contactor was short-circuited to prevent low voltage protection states. However, these measures did not resolve the issue, prompting a more comprehensive inspection. Upon detailed examination, no visible abnormalities were found, indicating that the problem was likely more complex and required a deeper investigation.

Identifying the Root Cause

With the control board reinstalled, testing revealed that the contactor jumped during startup, preventing the inverter from initiating. Interestingly, unplugging the 12CN plug cooling fan significantly improved the starting success rate. Observing the display panel during startup showed a decrease in brightness, suggesting a problem with the control power supply’s load capacity.

Further testing under load conditions revealed that while the power supply outputs were normal when unloaded, connecting resistive loads caused voltage drops. Specifically, when a 24V load was connected to the cooling fan and relay, the +5V line dropped to +4.7V. Although the screen display and other operations remained normal at this voltage, attempting to start the inverter resulted in the relay jumping and occasional fault codes such as “low DC voltage” and “communication interruption between CPU and operation panel.” Measurements indicated that when the +5V dropped below +4.5V, the inverter would automatically switch from the starting state to standby mode.

Analysis and Solution

The diagnosis of poor load capacity in the control power supply was confirmed. The CPU, with its strict power supply requirements, could barely function at voltages no less than 4.7V but would enter standby mode at voltages below 4.5V. The challenge lay in the fact that despite thorough checks, no components of the switch power supply were found to be damaged.

In an attempt to adjust the output voltage, a parallel resistance test was conducted on R1, one of the reference voltage divider resistors of the U1 (KA431AZ) voltage regulator. While this slightly increased the output voltage, the load capacity remained insufficient. Closer inspection of the circuit board revealed welding marks on the diversion adjustment tube Q1, indicating potential previous modifications. However, replacing Q1 with a similar component from another machine did not resolve the issue.

Given the complexity of the circuit and the high specificity of the transistors involved, particularly the bipolar transistor Q2 with high back pressure and amplification, a more nuanced approach was required. Analysis suggested that the working point of the shunt adjustment tube Q1 had shifted, causing excessive shunting of the base current of Q2. This, in turn, compromised the power supply’s load capacity.

To address this, a resistor (R6, 330 ohms) was series-connected with a voltage feedback optocoupler and a 47-ohm resistor. This modification aimed to reduce the base current of Q1, thereby decreasing its shunting capability towards Q2 and enhancing the power supply’s load capacity. Upon testing, the +5V line stably maintained 5V output, both under load and during startup operations, effectively resolving the issue.

TECO inverter 7200

Fault Inference and Conclusion

The fault was inferred to be due to the aging of the Q1 switch tube, leading to a decrease in its amplification ability. This resulted in insufficient base current (Ib) after shunting, causing Q1 to become fully conductive and increasing its conduction resistance. Additionally, a characteristic deviation in the shunt branch led to excessive shunting and poor driving of the switching tube, further reducing the power supply’s load capacity.

In summary, the repair process of the TECO 7200GA-30kW inverter involved meticulous diagnostic steps, from initial symptom observation to component testing and eventual circuit modification. The successful resolution highlights the importance of understanding the intricate workings of electronic systems and the creative application of engineering principles to overcome unexpected challenges. This case study serves as a valuable resource for technicians and engineers facing similar issues in industrial electronics repair.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Troubleshooting and Repairing a Switch Power Supply Malfunction in the Jialing VSD JP6C-9 Model

When dealing with complex electronic devices like the Jialing VSD JP6C-9, encountering issues such as a malfunctioning switch power supply can be both frustrating and challenging. This article details a step-by-step diagnostic and repair process for a specific case where the operation panel failed to display any information upon powering on, despite the input and output terminals of the main circuit exhibiting normal resistance levels. The root cause was identified as a power failure on the control board switch, accompanied by tell-tale signs of an abnormal power load.

Initial Observations and Symptom Analysis

Upon initial inspection, the most glaring symptom was the complete lack of display on the operation panel. Given that the resistance checks on the main circuit’s terminals were within acceptable ranges, it became evident that the issue was not with the primary power delivery but rather with the control circuitry. The presence of intermittent clicking sounds, which indicated a struggle in initiating the power supply, further narrowed down the potential culprits. Based on experience, such sounds often suggest issues related to power load abnormalities.

Systematic Diagnosis

The first step in the diagnostic process involved examining the rectification, filtering, and load circuits of each power supply segment. These components are crucial in ensuring smooth and stable power delivery. After thorough checks, no irregularities were found in these circuits, ruling out common failure points.

Next, an attempt was made to isolate and disconnect high-current power supply branches, including the cooling fan power supply, inverter drive power supply, and operation panel display power supply. This isolation technique is often effective in pinpointing which branch might be causing the overload. However, even after disconnecting these branches, the problem persisted, indicating that the issue was more deeply ingrained within the core power supply circuitry.

Deep Dive into the Switch Transformer Circuit

With the basic circuits ruled out, attention turned to the more intricate components of the power supply, specifically the peak voltage absorption network associated with the primary winding of the switch transformer. This network, typically comprising a resistor and capacitor in parallel, connected in series with a diode, serves a critical role in protecting the switching tube from abnormal peak voltages during its cut-off period.

Using a pointer multimeter, the forward and reverse resistance of the diode was measured, revealing an unusual reading of 15 ohms in both directions. This anomaly prompted a closer examination of the diode itself. Upon disassembly and individual testing, the diodes were found to be functional, suggesting that the issue lay elsewhere in the network.

A meticulous visual inspection revealed subtle cracks in the capacitor within the peak voltage absorption network. Further testing confirmed that the capacitor, rated at 2kV 103, had indeed suffered a breakdown and short-circuited. This discovery was crucial, as the capacitor’s failure had significant implications on the operation of the switch transformer.

Understanding the Impact of the Capacitor Failure

In a properly functioning system, the peak voltage absorption network absorbs energy during the switching tube’s conduction period, which is then safely discharged through the diode during the tube’s cut-off period. This mechanism prevents excessive voltage spikes from damaging the switching tube. However, with the capacitor short-circuited, the primary winding of the switch transformer was effectively paralleled with the diode. As a result, the energy accumulated during the conduction period was rapidly discharged, preventing the necessary oscillation energy from being stored.

Moreover, the diode acted as an excessive load on the switch transformer, impeding its ability to initiate the power supply’s startup sequence. This unusual manifestation of a capacitor short-circuit causing startup difficulties is relatively rare and underscores the importance of meticulous component inspection in troubleshooting such issues.

Repair and Restoration

With the faulty capacitor identified, the repair process involved replacing it with a new one of the same specifications. After the replacement, the machine was powered on once again, and this time, the operation panel lit up as expected, indicating a successful repair. The switch power supply was now functioning correctly, free from the previous startup difficulties.

Conclusion

This case study highlights the intricacies involved in diagnosing and repairing switch power supply malfunctions, particularly in sophisticated devices like the Jialing VSD JP6C-9. It underscores the importance of a systematic approach, thorough component inspection, and the use of appropriate diagnostic tools. By understanding the functionality of each component and its role in the overall system, technicians can effectively pinpoint and resolve even the most perplexing issues, ensuring the reliable operation of electronic equipment.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Maintenance of Switch Power Supply Fault in Taian N2-1013 VSD

Upon powering on, there was an OC fault. It was detected that the inverter output module was not damaged, and most of the six inverter drive ICs were damaged. Further inspection revealed a peculiar phenomenon in the switch mode power supply: when the CPU motherboard was disconnected for power supply,+5V was measured to be normal, but the power supply of other branches was higher than normal, such as+15V being+18V, and the driving power supply of 22V being 26V. When the wiring block of the CPU motherboard was connected,+5V was measured to be normal, but the power supply of other branches showed an abnormal increase! If the driving power supply of 22V even rises to nearly 40V (the maximum supply voltage of PC923 and PC929 is 36V), the damage to the driving IC is caused by this.

Key inspections were conducted on the voltage stabilization process, and peripheral circuits such as IC202 and PC9 showed no abnormalities. Further investigation revealed no abnormalities in other circuits, and maintenance was deadlocked.
Analysis: The voltage stabilizing part of the circuit works. The voltage sampling of the voltage regulator circuit is taken from the+5V circuit. When the wiring block of the CPU motherboard is unplugged, it is equivalent to a light load or no load of+5V. The rising trend of+5V increases the negative feedback of the voltage, reduces the duty cycle of the power switch driver pulse, reduces the excitation current of the switch transformer, and the output voltage of other branches is relatively low; When inserted into the wiring block of the CPU motherboard, it is equivalent to a+5V load or overload. The decreasing trend of+5V reduces the negative voltage feedback, increases the duty cycle of the power switch driver pulse, and increases the excitation current of the switch transformer, causing the output voltage amplitude of other branches to increase. The current situation is that when the+5V circuit is unloaded, although the output of other power supplies is lower, it is still higher+ After 5V loading, other power supply branches exhibit abnormally high voltage output! The faulty link is either due to a malfunction of the power supply itself causing a decrease in load capacity, or an abnormality in the load circuit. Both abnormalities have caused the voltage regulator circuit to undergo conscientious “misregulation”, resulting in the maintenance of the “voltage stability” of the+5V faulty circuit and the occurrence of “abnormal voltage changes” in other power supply branches!

Start repairing the+5V circuit, unplug the power filter capacitor C239220u10V, and check that the capacity is only a dozen microfarads, with obvious leakage resistance. The failure of a capacitor perfectly satisfies two conditions: a decrease in capacity reduces the power supply’s carrying capacity, and leakage causes the load to become heavier.
After replacing this capacitor, the test run was normal.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Troubleshooting Guide for CVF-G1 Switching Power Supplies in CONVO Frequency Converters

Title: Troubleshooting Guide for CVF-G1 Switching Power Supplies in CONVO Frequency Converters

Introduction:
We recently received three CVF-G1 frequency converters from Kangwo, all exhibiting identical issues: no output from the switching power supply and no screen display. Given that the power supply IC in these machines is a 3844B, and considering the rarity of this IC causing failures in multiple units simultaneously, we embarked on a troubleshooting journey focusing on the peripheral circuits.

Understanding the Switching Power Supply:
A typical switch-mode power supply comprises several key branches:

  1. Power-On Start Branch: This consists of a series of high-resistance resistors that, upon powering on, direct 500V DC to the 3844B power supply pin, initiating the switch tube’s starting voltage.
  2. Positive Feedback and Working Power Supply Branches: These are composed of feedback windings and rectifier filtering circuits, varying between machines in configuration.
  3. Voltage Stabilizing Branch: Powered by a secondary 5V supply, this branch compares 5V voltage changes against a reference, feeding back variables to the 3844B via an optocoupler. Notably, the CVF-G1 model feedback is derived from the primary side.

Conditions for Circuit Oscillation:
For the circuit to oscillate, the following must be met:

  1. The 500V power supply circuit must be functional, delivering DC voltage to the switch’s drain through the main winding.
  2. The power-on start branch must supply an adequate starting voltage (current).
  3. The positive feedback and working power supply branches must provide the necessary feedback voltage (current) and working power.
  4. The load side must be free of short circuits, as these prevent the establishment of sufficient feedback voltage, halting oscillation.

Troubleshooting Approach:
To pinpoint the fault, we began by isolating the voltage stabilizing branch to check if the circuit could oscillate without it. We ensured safety by implementing voltage reduction and disconnecting circuits susceptible to voltage damage. If the circuit oscillated, it suggested that the oscillation conditions were generally met, shifting our focus to the voltage stabilizing branch for further investigation. If not, the issue lay within the oscillation circuit itself.

Findings and Repairs:

  • Machine A: All four branches and 3844B peripherals checked out normal. Replacing the 3844B with a 3845B restored power output.
  • Machine B: Despite replacing the IC with a 3845B, oscillation failed to initiate. All branch components appeared normal. However, paralleling a 200k resistor with the existing 300k resistor in the power-on start branch resolved the issue, indicating a subtle performance shift in one or more components affecting electrical parameters.
  • Machine C: The fault was traced to the 3844B IC, and replacing it resolved the issue.

Analysis of Machine B’s Unique Fault:
Machine B’s fault was particularly intriguing. No obvious defective parts were found, yet it failed to oscillate until the starting branch’s resistance was adjusted. This suggests minor changes in component performance, such as reduced switching tube amplification, moisture-affected transformer Q values, increased 3844B output resistance, or slight variations in resistance/capacitance components. Identifying these precise causes can be challenging, but they all lead to one outcome: ineffective switch tube activation. Adjusting the starting branch’s resistance proved to be an effective solution, highlighting the importance of adequate starting current for circuit oscillation.

Conclusion and Recommendations:
Based on our experience, an efficient repair strategy for similar issues involves:

  1. Verifying the switch tube’s integrity and the general functionality of the four branches.
  2. Conducting a parallel resistance test on the starting branch.
  3. If unsuccessful, replacing the 3844B IC.
  4. If issues persist, conducting a thorough circuit inspection.

Often, issues are resolved during the initial tests, emphasizing the importance of a systematic approach to troubleshooting. Additionally, considering the role of starting current in circuit oscillation, adjusting the starting branch’s resistance may offer a simple yet effective solution in many cases.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Repair Guide for INVT G9 Series Frequency Converter “Crash” Fault

Repair Guide for INVT G9 Series Frequency Converter “Crash” Fault

When dealing with a reported “crash” fault in an INVT G9 series frequency converter, a systematic approach to diagnosis and repair is crucial. This article outlines a step-by-step process based on user feedback, detailed inspection, and successful repair.

INVT INVERTER physical picture

User Feedback and Initial Observations

The user reported that the frequency converter was not operational at the time of the incident, but other machines on the same three-phase power supply experienced abnormalities, leading to a short circuit and tripping. Consequently, the power switch for the frequency converter also tripped. Upon attempting to reset the power switch, it was discovered that the operation panel was no longer displaying any information, prompting the need for repair.

Detailed Inspection and Fault Identification

Upon inspecting the frequency converter, an open circuit was found between the R, S, T terminals and the main DC circuit (P and N). Further disassembly revealed that the copper foil strip connecting to the module had been damaged by an arc. Testing confirmed a short circuit at the three-phase power supply terminal of the module.

Root Cause Analysis

The root cause of the malfunction was traced back to instantaneous short circuits and tripping of other load branches in the power supply, which induced abnormal voltage spikes in the three-phase power supply. These dangerous voltage levels caused the rectifier circuit in the frequency converter module to break down and short circuit. The resulting strong arc burned the copper foil strip and triggered the power switch to trip.

Repair Plan

INVT inverter drive board

Fortunately, the inverter part of the module was still functional, with no signs of bulging or deformation. Therefore, the decision was made to cut off the damaged rectification part of the module and install an additional three-phase rectification bridge. This low-cost repair plan allowed for the reuse of the original three-phase inverter circuit in the module.

Inspection and Troubleshooting

To prevent further abnormalities, the power supply to the inverter section of the module was cut off. A 500V DC voltage was applied from an external repair power supply, but the operation panel displayed “H.00,” and all operations were ineffective. Based on experience, this indicated that the module’s short circuit detection function had activated, causing the CPU to reject all operations.

Further inspection revealed that the overcurrent signals in the fault signal collection and processing circuit were all negative, whereas they should have been positive under normal conditions. Tracing the current detection circuit, it was found that an incorrect overcurrent signal was being output. By disconnecting the overcurrent fault signal, the operation panel’s parameter settings returned to normal, but the start/stop operation still had no response.

Additional Fault Signals and Resolution

Suspecting that there might be other fault signals causing the frequency converter to remain in protection mode, the voltage at the module’s thermal alarm terminal was measured and found to be 3V, lower than the normal 5V. It was hypothesized that the damaged rectification circuit might be outputting a thermal alarm signal. By cutting off the copper foil strip connected to the thermal alarm, the start/stop operation on the operation panel became effective.

Protection Sequence and Final Repairs

The protection sequence of the INVT G9/P9 frequency converter is designed to ensure safe operation. If a fault is detected in the power inverter output section during power-on detection, the SC – output short circuit fault code will be displayed, and all operations will be rejected. Similarly, if an overcurrent signal is detected, “H.00” will be displayed, and all operations will be halted. When a thermal alarm signal is detected, most operations can be performed, but the startup operation is rejected to prevent overheating.

To complete the repair, the damaged copper foil strip lead of the three-phase power supply was cut off, cleaned, and properly insulated. An external three-phase rectifier circuit was connected, and its DC output was introduced to the P and N terminals. Additionally, a thermal protection circuit was installed using a 60℃ normally closed thermal relay, which is connected in series with an NPN type transistor base to the 5V ground circuit. This ensures that the module does not overheat and burn, providing an additional layer of safety.

By following this structured approach, the INVT G9 series frequency converter was successfully repaired, restoring it to full functionality.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Handling Method for SC Jumping Fault of GS Series INVT VSD

SC: Refers to a short circuit in the output load of the frequency converter. In the state of power outage, there is no short circuit between U, V, W and between U, V, W and DC P, N. To distinguish whether it is a current detection circuit fault on the CPU motherboard or a signal returned by the driving IC, short circuit the signal to the diode side of the optocoupler device with a wire, and operate the RUN key after power on. The output frequency displayed on the panel is normal. The SC signal is returned by the driving IC, and there are two reasons for the malfunction: first, the inverter module is damaged, and second, the driving IC itself is faulty.

After cutting off the power supply to the inverter module, the six pulse signals of the drive IC were checked again. It was found that the U-upper arm drive IC had input pulses but no output pulses (static negative pressure normal). After replacing the drive IC, the output was normal. The static negative pressure of the U lower arm drive IC is only a few tenths of a volt. After replacement, the fault still persists. After welding the 100 ohm resistor connected to the trigger end of the inverter module, the static negative pressure rises to the normal value. The forward resistance of the lower arm terminal of the module U is consistent with the resistance of other trigger terminals, but its reverse resistance is slightly smaller than that of other trigger terminals, indicating that the circuit inside the U-phase trigger terminal of the module is damaged!
This is a key point in checking module faults: the resistance of the main terminal cannot be roughly measured to be normal, which means that the module is good. It is not uncommon for the circuit inside the triggering terminal to be damaged, but it is more concealed! When the frequency converter reports an SC or OC fault and the main terminal of the detection module is normal, the inspection of the forward and reverse resistance of the triggering terminal should not be missed!
The damage of modules and the damage of driving ICs are usually related: when the U-phase main circuit is damaged, the upper and lower arm driving ICs of the U-phase are often also damaged by strong voltage shocks; When the driver IC of the phase is found to be damaged, it often hides the internal circuit damage of the triggering terminal of the phase. So one of the two is that a comprehensive inspection must be conducted. Of course, there are also cases where modules and driver ICs are damaged separately, but it is extremely rare.

During maintenance, another phenomenon of drive IC failure was also discovered in the low-power model of the Envision GS: when the frequency converter is powered on and there is an SC fault signal output, the CPU performs self check, reset, and reset, and after clearing, the panel only displays H:00, and all panel buttons fail to operate. When the corresponding optocoupler circuit is short circuited to eliminate the SC signal, all panel operations are normal. If the model detects an SC fault signal output when powered on, it may perform a “program lock” and refuse to operate! When this phenomenon occurs, the fault signal output circuit should be checked and corresponding measures should be taken to temporarily eliminate the fault signal, in order to facilitate operation and judgment, and thus solve the fault.

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Special situation of Alpha VFD tripping OC fault

Generally speaking, there are two sources of OC faults:

  1. When the operating current of the inverter module is too high, reaching more than three times the rated current, and the voltage drop of the IGBT tube rises to more than 7V, the driving IC returns an overload OC signal to notify the CPU and implement fast shutdown protection;
  2. After collecting a sharp increase in abnormal current from three current transformers at the output end of the frequency converter (some low-power models use two), a voltage comparator (or internal circuit of the CPU) outputs an OC signal to notify the CPU and implement fast shutdown protection.

Of course, when the driving IC or current sampling circuit is abnormal, the frequency converter will falsely report an OC fault.
Small power models often use a shunt resistor directly connected in series at the output end to collect current signals. After being amplified in the front stage, they are isolated by an optocoupler operational amplifier and transmitted to the CPU. The power supply of its preamplifier is taken from the floating power supply of the driving IC. In this way, when the module is damaged (or removed), the power supply branch connected to the inverter module is broken, causing the current sampling circuit to output the highest negative pressure. The CPU mistakenly believes that there is a large current signal and reports an OC fault. In this situation, the frequency converter trips the OC fault as soon as it is powered on, making it impossible to inspect whether the drive IC circuit can output six normal trigger pulses.
In addition, if the peripheral circuit of the driving IC is abnormal or damaged, it can also misreport OC faults. Therefore, during maintenance, it is necessary to distinguish whether it is a fault reported by the current sampling circuit or the driving IC, whether it is a circuit damage misreport or a module damage. Is there really an overcurrent fault? And take measures to clear the alarm status for easy maintenance.
But the OC jumping faults caused by the following reasons often go unnoticed. Overhaul an Alpha frequency converter. Due to damage to the main DC circuit voltage detection circuit, the voltage on terminal 8 was 0 (normally around 3V). The frequency converter experienced an undervoltage fault and could not be put into operation. When the terminal is artificially fed with a voltage of+5V, the frequency converter trips the OC fault when powered on. Through experiments, it has been proven that when the voltage is below 2.5V, an undervoltage fault code will trip, and when the voltage is above 3.8V, an OC fault will trip. Therefore, it is found that when the DC circuit voltage is too high or the DC detection circuit is abnormal, it is another reason for the frequency converter to trip the OC fault.

When conducting maintenance or emergency response, take 5V voltage from the 8 pins of the wiring block CN1 and fix a 3V voltage with a divider resistor. This will facilitate maintenance or emergency operation of the frequency converter.